Thursday, 19 April 2012

Invisible Dick


Before I move on to today's feature presentation, let's pause for a moment to remember Dick Clark, who died yesterday at age 82. I just mentioned his cave-inspired house last week!

From http://www.theliterarygiftcompany.com/invisible-dick-card-4724-p.asp



Invisible Dick is a children’s novel written by Frank Topham and published in 1926. I discovered this wonder while in the gift shop of the British Library; a greeting-card company makes blank cards with pictures of awkward book covers. Naturally, I had to check this out, and, luckily for me, the British Library owned a copy of this gem. So when I needed a break from scholarly literature, Invisible Dick was there!

The title character, Richard Brett (variously called “Dick” or “Dicky” by friends and family) discovers a little bottle of potion (as it were) that renders you invisible if you sniff it. How long you remain invisible depends on how big of a whiff you take. Dick found this Harry-Potter-esque elixir when staying with his absent-minded professor uncle, who is a stereotype of 1920s British Egyptologists. This bachelor (of course!) professor has a special study called the “fossil room” in which he has a mummy, several human skulls, and various other archaeological treasures. Umm, shouldn’t those things be in a museum, dude? Ah well, I’m sure they’re safe – a British man is in charge of them.

As you might suspect, the rest of the book chronicles all the mischief Invisible Dick has. These are pretty harmless pranks: taking off a policeman’s helmet and playing keep away, turning a dog invisible so he can take it home with him (his parents have to let him keep it when it shows up at their door unannounced), and generally messing around at school. The main thing that concerned me was the number of crimes Invisible Dick manages to thwart. The action really gets rolling when a burglar tries to steal the invisibility potion from the professor-uncle; not only does this felon only manage to steal the substitute Dick created, he also is scared out of his wits when Invisible Dick animates some skulls. Another time, Dick sneaks over to his aunt’s to play tricks at a séance and reveals that the medium has stuffed his pockets full of valuable trinkets and silverware. A third incident involves him solving a kidnapping! In a fourth, he prevents his aunt and uncle from being swindled in a property transaction. Was crime that bad in 1920s England? Or was the author really so uncreative that the best adventures he could create involved triumphing over evil? Obviously, Mr. Topham was writing a clean-cut, feel-good book for boys. Equally obvious is that Invisible Dick is pre-pubescent or his first madcap adventure would have been straight to a ladies’ dressing room.

Some quotable gems:

“Snakes!” This is used as an exclamation by many people; it make’s Velma’s “jinkies!” look positively cool.

“My word, Aunt Fannie, you are some whoozer with that jazz jumper.”
            -this is a compliment, as Aunt Fannie thanks Dick

“What brought you here?”
“My legs. Didn’t you see ‘em?” said Dick.
“If you get much sharper you will be cutting yourself,” said Robert [a policeman friend of Dick’s].

“‘Jeehosophat! What a disgraceful scene!’ said Dick Brett, doing a series of physical jerks behind a bush, as he began to grow into visibility.

“Then he [Invisible Dick] started off to put himself through a series of physical jerks, since he had found them a means of driving off more rapidly the effects of the strange Egyptian essence.”

“‘Whoops!’ shouted Dick Brett, jumping out of bed and doing his morning dose of physical jerks.”

“‘Between the brain of a chimpanzee and that of the lower savages there is comparatively little difference,’ said Pikes solemnly. ‘Far less difference than there is between the brain of such a savage and such a brain as yours, Knowles [the professor uncle].’”

I can’t totally recommend this book, though, as it contains many mentions of kids being caned at school. Most of them are just threats or mentions that it happens, but one boy was hit across the hand (although we only hear that he was blowing into his palm where the cane had landed) and another receives a whacking. The boys frequently talk about lining their jackets with paper, so perhaps they are hit on the back?

The other funny part is the frequency with which they are allowed to skip school. Dick misses school for a month because his sister has the measles and he has to be shuttled off to a relative, he spends a day visiting the waxworks with his uncle, attending a party, and traveling with his aunt to check out the bunk property. And I thought people nowadays missed school for no good reason!

Thursday, 12 April 2012

Dick Madness: And the Winner is ... !!!!!!




To keep you in suspense just a tiny bit longer (Don’t prematurely scroll down! Don’t prematurely scroll down!), please “enjoy” my first (and utterly horrible) foray into Photoshop.
Robins can fly, which is why Dick Grayson hovers in the air.

Seriously, if you don’t use Photoshop to create pictures of Dicks making out then what is even the point of owning Photoshop?

I have decided, however, not to blame this debacle on my own ridiculously bad photo shopping skills, but on Richard III. There is a shocking dearth of images of him making out with people. I can’t say the same for Dick Grayson; if the internet is to be believed, that guy will make out with anyone. Naturally, I picked one featuring him (as Robin on Batman: The Animated Series) making out with Bruce Wayne/Batman. Another thing the internet loves is Bat-homosexuality, with the murkiness of potential pedophilia thrown in to make it extra-titillating.

Anyway, Richard III is a terrible lover. It’s as though these two don’t even know each other.

Back to business, though. The winner is ….


Richard III. Duh. (Well that was anti-climatic).

Dick Grayson gave Richard III a bit of a run for his money, but Richard III – the biggest, most fascinating, and most hard-core Dick of all – eventually triumphed.

Three huzzahs for Richard III!!!

To celebrate Richard III’s epic win, I’m going to discuss a shout-out he received over a month ago in a Cracked.com article, written by Cracked columnist Daniel O’Brien and linked here. I must admit, I didn’t think it was one of the author’s better articles, but Richard III got a mention, so I have to show it some love.

Anyway, Richard III comes up in relation to Humpty Dumpty (who sat on a wall, etc.). The relevant part of the article declares:

Doing the least amount of research expected of me, I clicked around Wikipedia for a while to dig into old nursery rhymes and learned that the story of Humpty Dumpty actually used to be a riddle, the answer of which was "egg." When the answer to the riddle became too well-known, everyone stopped calling it a riddle and started calling it a nursery rhyme….

No one seems to know where this original riddle version of Humpty Dumpty is or where it came from, and there are competing theories that suggest that Humpty Dumpty was either a tortoise, a cannon or a stand-in for King Richard III of England, designed to make some kind of satirical observation about the king. That he was bad at sitting on walls? Wait, if Humpty Dumpty is supposed to be King Richard, who the hell is "the king" supposed to represent in this satire?

I was rather shocked to read this because I had never heard about any possible connections between Richard III and Humpty Dumpty – and I like to think I pretty much know everything about Richard III. Naturally, I had to examine Wikipedia myself, which informed me that:

There are also various theories of an original "Humpty Dumpty". One, advanced by Katherine Elwes Thomas in 1930[5]and adopted by Robert Ripley,[1] posits that Humpty Dumpty is King Richard III of England, depicted in Tudor histories, and particularly in Shakespeare's play, as humpbacked and who was defeated, despite his armies at Bosworth Field in 1485. However, the term humpback was not recorded until the eighteenth century, and no direct evidence linking the rhyme with the historical figure has been advanced.[6]

Yes, Wikipedia has footnotes. Follow the link to see the sources for yourself.

So how did we get here and is it true (short answer: no)? Although I haven’t read the works of either Thomas or Ripley (mentioned by Wikipedia), I gather that Shakespeare is pretty important to this whole she-bang, which makes me think the horses could relate to “A horse! A horse! My kingdom for a horse!”

*In case you aren’t familiar with Shakespeare and the whole “Tudor myth” regarding Richard III, it basically portrays Richard III as a heinous, deformed villain who murdered his way to the throne (killing a former king, a prince, his own brother, his nephews, his wife, and a few more besides). This narrative helped justify the Tudor take-over of the throne. The first Tudor king, Henry VII, had a weak dynastic claim, so it helped his cause to portray his predecessor (whom he had killed in battle) as a tyrant not fit to rule glorious England. Henry got to save the English people from their monstrous former king. Everybody (except Richard, obviously) won – Henry got to look awesome and Shakespeare got a ready-made villain just itching to star in an epic history play. 

So my suggestion for this fine nursery rhyme is as follows:

Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall [Richard III on the throne]
Humpty Dumpty had a great fall [Richard III was a usurping king who ruled for only two years and then had his ass handed to him at Bosworth by Henry VII]
All the king’s horses and all the king’s men [All Richard’s horses and men couldn’t help him]
Couldn’t put Humpty together again [Richard III was defeated and dead after Bosworth]

Personally, I think this seems like a bit of a stretch. The whole riddle/rhyme is so general it could apply to any arrogant guy who got his come-uppance (assuming you take “great fall” in a metaphorical sense). But the main reason I don’t think it applies to Richard III is that this rhyme is a sneaky insult (you thought you were so great, but you aren’t – ha!). Pretty much from the second Richard III died (on 22 August 1485), it was open season on his reputation. Some of it was deserved (he probably really did have his nephews murdered), but some of it was embellished to make him more delightfully villainous (he wasn’t grotesquely malformed, he didn’t woo his wife over the corpse of her first husband, and he probably didn’t poison her – she likely had tuberculosis). By the time this supposed riddle was invented, people had no reason to insult Richard III in subtle, crafty ways. If they wanted to rip into him, they could just say, “Man, King Richard III? He was such a dick! What an arrogant SOB! And murdering his poor little nephews? He’s a wart on the fair monarchy of jolly ole England!” Why waste time creating an insulting riddle about a guy who, thanks to Shakespeare and other Tudor writers, you can just dis freely? 

Wikipedia has some other suggestions, mainly relating to siege engines and the English Civil War of 1640-1649. They could be possibilities, but they also seem rather far-fetched. This Humpty Dumpty stuff is just nonsense!

In other news, Dick Clark also got a shout-out in this article about homes that are “inspired by nature.” Dick’s house is located in Malibu, California and can be yours for a cool $3.5 million. Considering the house only has one bedroom and two bathrooms, I’m guessing much of that price tag is based on its huge parcel of land (22.89 acres), incredible views, and location, location, location.

Thursday, 5 April 2012

Dick Madness Final Round!!!!!!


It’s finally here, the moment you’ve all been waiting for! We’re down to our final two Dicks, and only one can triumph! Mirror, mirror on the wall, who’s the biggest Dick of all? You decide!

I must admit, though, that you all (my dear family and friends) have been most obliging. Without me having to jerry-rig the votes AT ALL, my favorite historical Dick will be facing off against my favorite fictional Dick. It’s a dream come true. Thank you for bending to my will.

As you can surely guess, the face-off is:

Richard III vs. Dick Grayson




There’s really nothing more to say because I have talked about these two so much. Below you’ll find a links to all the posts in which each Dick is prominently featured, just in case you want to catch up.

Richard III


Dick Grayson


As always, e-mail me your votes at dicksihavestudied@gmail.com. May the biggest Dick win!