Quite the dandy, isn't he?
In July 2009, I purchased a mug
at the National Portrait Gallery gift shop, which featured miniature cartoon
drawings of the monarchs of England since 1066. Each ruler, from William the
Conqueror to Elizabeth II, was depicted in varying sensible (John looking
shocked when reading Magna Carta) to ridiculous (Henry II playing leapfrog with
a table) fashion. Three of the kings appeared as children, conveniently labeled
with their ages when they ascended the throne: Richard II (age ten), Edward V
(age thirteen), and Edward VI (age nine). Depicting Edward V and Edward VI as
children makes sense, as both died before reaching adulthood (around ages
thirteen and sixteen, respectively). Richard II, on the other hand, ruled as
king for twenty-two years, going from a ten-year-old boy to a
thirty-two-year-old man. Richard II’s situation more closely parallels Henry
III (king at age nine) and Henry VI (king at age nine months) than the two later
Edwards. Richard was a child when he became king, but he was a man when he was
deposed. Unlike Richard, though, Henry III and Henry VI are represented on the
mug as men, leaving the Black Prince’s son as the only perpetual child who
actually grew up. The mug’s seeming mistake is a modern manifestation of
Richard II’s image problem. Despite becoming a chronological adult, Richard II,
in the eyes of many, never reached full maturity.
At one point,
I tried that as an intro to a discussion of Richard II's maturity
problem. It was not academic enough to remain in the dissertation, but I
find it very telling. Why is it that Richard II, out of all the kings
of England, can't grow up, even hundreds of years later? Even Henry VI
gets to grow up and he became king at age 9 months.
Christopher
Fletcher has written a really great book about Richard's maturity
problem (citation below), but I argue it also had something to do with
Richard's childlessness. Maybe someday I'll be published and you can
read about it.
*Fletcher, Christopher David.
Richard II: Manhood,
Youth, and Politics, 1377-99. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
2008.
No comments:
Post a Comment